|
The ethos of
the US State of Maine holds that those who've only been there for
merely three or
four
(or ten!) generations are not "REAL Mainers" or, as Maine Comedian Tim Sample has
observed in his Downeast twang,
Here are the facts:It's sad that, yet again, the web is being used as a tool of vengeance since that's all this really is. A couple of people who couldn't seem to get along in regular/recognized Freemasonry are now out to prove that they have created something (after several tries, it would seem) that's better than the 300 year old organization they seek to supplant. We will, however, directly address the claims made by those from GOOFUS:
Much is also being made about making of women Masons and although we've written about this previously, the groups we mention on our website page are long-established. GOOFUS, created today and perhaps gone tomorrow, would be a MUCH more risky proposition if a woman were to join. You can use your imagination as to the potential problems.... Oh, and wait....Like to have a good chat about politics? What about going off in your Masonic apron to picket the visit by the Pope, for example or having a rally in all of your finery to protest a certain electoral candidate? Are you ok with that? Oh, and that religious context that you thought Masons said was so important? FORGET IT! Within hours, one sock puppet on a blog wrote "What exactly has your Masonry done to defend human rights rights recently? What has it done to promote religious tolerance recently?" The same, obviously, could be asked of this group. Railing against others for not having done something that has yet to be done by you is disingenuous at best. And the real answer is - from a regular/recognized Freemasonic standpoint - frankly, NOTHING because that is not the work of Freemasonry no matter how righteous it sounds. Freemasonry - the REAL kind - does not take partisan positions in religion or politics. It has been ably noted by all thinkers that, in most cases, defending one person's human rights may rightfully deny another of them. From a strictly rhetorical standpoint, it makes great theatre to claim that this new organization will do that. We should not quickly forget, though, that claims of such lofty accomplishments by a group that was barely 24 hours old when they were made are, to say the least, premature. Then, of course, there's that hyperbole that has become so standard in all of the groups formed by this one individual: can we remember back just a couple of years ago when it was claimed that one of their predecessor groups was going to help the youth of America by supporting DeMolay - except that they LIED! By its very existence, Freemasonry (the regular/recognized kind) practices religious tolerance and thus stands as a beacon to it rather than as an activist in a partisan campaign whereby you might find yourself on the 'wrong side of the tracks' as arguments flair over which religion should be supported over which other. In the Grand Orient of France, there's no Bible and nothing whatsoever to do with prayers. Secular humanism - or whatever brand of agnosticism you wish - is what you'll find there...and now, being touted as a 'better kind' of Freemasonry than the one that has existed for some 300 years teaching that faith, hope and charity are essential to a man's life and character. Yes, there are those little problematic things that aren't mentioned on their website. Frankly, we think it's like ordering a rib-eye steak and being told that the tofu placed in front of you is really what you wanted. (And no, we don't have anything against tofu.... well, maybe but that was just an example!....) And let's not forget - as one chat room moderator has already commented: "Can someone explain how honourable men of integrity last year believed that a recognition of a supreme being was a landmark and that non inclusion of females was another landmark, have this year completely reversed those held and sworn views?"
Let's add one other very important point:So far, the organizations started by the person who started this one have had the half life of a fruit fly. Do you have ANY reason to believe that this will be any different? In truth, all you're going to see are pseudonyms and claims: never pictures nor any kind of proof whatsoever that this is anything more than just another personal aggrandizement - a website created for what can charitably be referred to as 'smoke and mirrors'. Self-Identification:Barely 24 hours after their start, ONE individual identified himself publicly as being a member: Brad Cofield of California. Mr. Cofield, if our memory serves, had during 2006 received two of the necessary three degrees in regular/recognized Freemasonry when his progress was halted due to a 'conflict'. From his perspective, he was the victim (of course) of a series of events in which he was endeavoring to serve and help while others found his actions to be.... disingenuous. From the perspective of his lodge, he was disruptive, abrasive, and they had seen enough of him to know that he shouldn't be allowed to proceed and become a Master Mason. We found it intriguing that within 24 hours of the GOFUS formation, a person some 3,000 miles away from where their claimed lodge supposedly existed somehow managed to become a member AND RECEIVE A DEGREE. Mr. Cofield, after previously having been banned from several online forums, returned to tout his membership and the great works of this group (formed just day earlier, remember). With him as a self-appointed pitchman, you'll get a very clear picture of whom you'll wind up associating with should you choose to jump in the deep end of the pool with these folks. It's curious too that NO ONE from this supposedly active group comprised of so many young, technically savvy individuals didn't challenge Mr. Cofield's claims in any way.
What's particularly sad is that this individual who has attended TWO (only) "real" Masonic Lodge meetings - and the group that he was trying to support really seems to only exist in the mind of its creator. This rant shown above is not at all unlike ones he'd posted about his (former) Lodge brothers who had stopped him from becoming a Master Mason, finding him unfit for it. For Brad, it seems, every bad situation is of someone else's making but this is also a typical behavioral trait of those few who have so easily succumbed to the Pied Piper who recruits for his never-ending metamorphosis of pseudo-Masonic organizations. There's more about Brad and his claims here.
Their Affiliations....When you first read that they have 'fraternal relations' with the Grand Orient of France and the George Washington Union of Freemasons in North America (although often coyly phrased as if they might not want to publicize it too widely and actually have one or both of those organizations officially deny it), it sounds pretty impressive even if the latter of the two bodies is something you think was somehow another branch of Prince Hall Freemasonry or whatever. You'd be surprised how deceiving that all is though. The Grand Orient of France has a long history indeed. Because of France's proximity to England, Freemasonry arrived there very shortly after the formation of the first Grand Lodge in England in 1717. While originally very democratic in terms of membership (as documented by Professor Margaret C. Jacob in her seminal work in this area), it soon became the playground for French nobility with the common man being forced from the scene nearly completely. Records of histories are either absent or contradictory and anyone who claims full and complete understanding of the many issues of French Freemasonry's first century is a pretender. Suffice it to say that in 1877, the Grand Orient decided that freedom of conscience meant that a lodge should not have to ask whether a person held a belief in God. Thus atheists, agnostics, and basically anyone could join if they said they felt they could lead a good life. This flew in the face of western beliefs that having faith in God (regardless of how defined) was a crucial element to keeping one's bond. There followed also acceptance of policies which allowed inter-visitation with mixed gender lodges etc. which is FAR different from the esoteric-initiatic path that the founder of GOOFUS seems to hawk. This affiliation - if, in fact, it's anything more than a lie - comes at a time when the Grand Orient of France has been embroiled in some heated political matters in France and when many non-recognized groups are making moves to position themselves as being 'strong by association'. Perhaps they don't realize that the Grand Orient of the United States of America will only add a handful (if that) of members to their stable - or perhaps their name is being used without their permission! And while we've always tried to be non-political here at masonicinfo.com, are there really big groups of Americans thinking that the French way of doing things is a great example to adopt? Now we mean NO disrespect here whatsoever and we're not like the crazy US congress-critters who wanted to ban the 'French Fry' a few years ago. However, we just don't quite see the synchronicity that would make this attractive. Why would young, ostensibly upward-mobile, American males - regardless of their ancestry - want to look to France for guidance in the way to run an organization? Or to look for the French for their approval, regardless of how wonderful they might feel the French Revolution was a couple of centuries ago? Perhaps they find the very political stances which the GOF takes to be attractive and they too want to use Freemasonry for political clout in pursuing their own goals. Perhaps it's the lack of any religious base in French Grand Orient Freemasonry that they now find attractive (or convenient). We think, though, that most men who come to regular/recognized Freemasonry would, when there's a comparison between the policies of the GOF and regular/recognized Grand Lodges would nearly always choose the later. And, as stated above, we fail to see any announcement whatsoever from the GOdF that they've made any agreement of any kind with the newly created "Grand Orient of the United States". More obfuscation or just French laxity? We'll eventually see.... The George Washington Union was formed some thirty years ago. Pretty impressive, you're thinking: they're still going strong so what's the problem? Well, while it was formed thirty years ago, there are only FIVE (count 'em) lodges in their whole stable. They are as follows: Franklin Roosevelt - Chicago (which doesn't seem to be meeting and there's no information on their web page), Golden journey - San francisco, Liberty - Washington which claims to be meeting in Bethesda, Maryland at an undisclosed location, Raoul Zetler - Montreal (which is in a very run-down part of town and is in a building used by various New Age groups and societies) and New Isis- Los Angeles which ostensibly meets in the (real) Masonic building of a California Lodge in Van Nuys that can be rented for weddings, receptions, parties, etc. In California it is not uncommon for many groups of varying kinds to use Masonic buildings for their meetings. This, of course, may give this particular "lodge" group the appearance of Masonic regularity but should you try to visit any one of the four lodges which make up the ownership of the building and are part of the Grand Lodge of California, you'd find yourself rejected. But, despite their small number of lodges, their membership in the 2006 World Masonic Report show at a staggering - hold on for this - THIRTY SEVEN. Yes, folks: 37. Not 37,000. Not 3,700. Not even 370. Thirty seven. With five lodges that means they've got an average membership throughout the United States & Canada of less than 8 members per lodge. While it could be argued that there are lodges in regular/recognized Freemasonry where attendance might be lower than this, they're few and far between - and the rest of the lodges in the jurisdiction are there also. This is 5 lodges & 37 members - in total. We won't belabor it further: we've done the math for you so you can mull over what a tour de force you'll be joining up with should you go with these folks. It should be noted that on December 10, 2007 we discovered a NEW website - at the domain of Mr. Peace's old tracingboard.com where he had excoriated various Grand Masters in Georgia, this site and its owner, and more - done up more neatly for the George Washington Union group. It made them look FAR more hip than their 1990s site (never updated) but, of course, one wonders on what authority this was done. No matter. By March, 2008 it was changed yet again and now purports to be "A place supporting a dialogue among Traditional Cosmopolitan Freemasonry in North America, the Anglo-American tradition of Freemasonry and wider civil society." Yeah, if there were any such thing! It really is to laugh.
Even better: you can claim - like other anonymous posters on a particular blog which touts this group but whose creator, curiously, doesn't have the faith in them to leave his membership in the Grand Lodge of Georgia behind to jump on board - that you too are going to be part. Don't forget: you can post the same message several times with different screen names so that it'll look like there's LOTS of folks doing it - and only the blog's owner will know that it's really one person, perhaps one person who's also the Grand Poobah! Oh, and please say a prayer of remembrance for the many, many poor members who were left behind when the now completely gone from the internet (and everywhere else, it seems) United Grand Lodge of America went away. <sniffle></sarcasm> PS: Are they REALLY recognized by the groups they claim? Is it just smoke and mirrors again? Stay tuned.... Created 26 November 2007 OH! And check
here for some 'factual
information' from the Grand Master of the Grand Orient of the United States,
formerly known as the Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of America. Ain't
it GRAND? |
|
|
This site and its contents are © (copyright) 1998-2008 by Edward L. King. All rights reserved. Got some thoughts or reactions?
We'd be interested in your comments - within reason. |